In the chart they use "Pareto Line", which I think is wrong. Pareto is 20% effort leading to 80% results. Which could be interpreted as models costing 20% having 80% of peak intelligence, but that’s not what it looks like to me.
It looks like the "Frontier Line" to me, which is also often misinterpreted. frontier does not mean the best models. It means all models that are not strictly dominated, meaning in most cases: Not same price or cheaper and more intelligent.
I personally would like the word frontier to be used with more criterias: Open Weights, per use-case, etc etc. This would make model selection easier, but I understand it’s not an easy thing to do.
No, Pareto refers to Pareto efficiency <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_efficiency" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_efficiency
What you call "frontier line" is also called "Pareto frontier" <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front
Your description of it is basically correct though
jwpapi · · focus · HN ↗
It looks like the "Frontier Line" to me, which is also often misinterpreted. frontier does not mean the best models. It means all models that are not strictly dominated, meaning in most cases: Not same price or cheaper and more intelligent.
I personally would like the word frontier to be used with more criterias: Open Weights, per use-case, etc etc. This would make model selection easier, but I understand it’s not an easy thing to do.
nextaccountic · · focus · HN ↗
What you call "frontier line" is also called "Pareto frontier" <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_front
Your description of it is basically correct though