‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI coding has made CI a bottleneck, so we reworked ours to keep up

317 points · 408 comments · julian_digital

  1. classictraffic · · focus · HN ↗
    > Moving our workloads off GitHub Actions to third-party runners with faster CPUs, higher-performance storage, and better cache infrastructure gave us faster machines to run the same pipeline on

    Yeah, was not surprised to read this. Actions is convenient if you already use GitHub, but it can also be pretty slow. Given reliability is also a major issue with GitHub these days I expect to see more orgs moving to different pipelines

    1. DanielHB · · focus · HN ↗
      My company did this a couple of years ago to some machines we host ourselves. It is a bit of trouble to set up but it is not that bad and can easily save a 1000+ dollars per month since GHA runners are very expensive.

      It is that grey zone where it is kinda worth it to pay someone to do it, but also might not be worth it the headaches of managing that person and the infra (like what happens if they go on vacation). The improved speed is the thing that tilts the balance.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.