Thread

1. auggierose · 1790032042 · focus · HN ↗

   > We are currently facing the very specific challenge of advising OpenAI on how to coordinate the release of a large number of significant results in mathematics that they report have been produced by their internal model.

   The only thing I want to see is the problem statements, solutions, and associated Lean proofs. Anything else is gatekeeping. What a low point for academia.

   1. SpicyLemonZest · 1790044619 · focus · HN ↗

      I'm not sure how you've ended up so frustrated with an advisory group whose advice has not been given. Human mathematicians routinely delay publication of their results past the point you describe; is someone gatekeeping when they take a month to clean up their paper?

      Or are you perhaps sublimating your own AI anxiety into confrontational assertions that other people who discuss AI aren't as AI-pilled as you?

      1. auggierose · 1790046241 · focus · HN ↗

         You can delay your own publication as long as you wish to. Bullying somebody else to delay theirs is a different thing entirely.

         1. qnleigh · 1790049067 · focus · HN ↗

            OpenAI put together an advisory panel to provide guidance on how to release their results. Where do you see bullying?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.