‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

NASA’s Mars Sample Return mission is dead

456 points · 391 comments · Muhammad523

  1. Imnimo · · focus · HN ↗
    I never really understood why you'd have Perseverance drill the cores and then just leave them on the ground for an underdefined future mission to retrieve.
    1. yabones · · focus · HN ↗
      An all-in-one solution would be far too heavy. Splitting the tasks up makes a lot of sense. Having all the equipment onboard to drill cores, quickly analyze them, decide if they're worth keeping, and then putting samples in containers is enough work for one rover.

      * Storing all the samples onboard means a larger and heavier rover

      * Mass budget squeeze means no more helicopter

      * The return requires a ground launch from mars, so no more SkyCrane delivery system

      1. nomilk · · focus · HN ↗
        Whoa... TIL the rover had a tissue-box-sized helicopter (!!) on it! (and apparently the rotors must spin several times faster than a helicopter on earth due to Mars's sparse atmosphere). That's incredible.

        I feel like SpaceX does an amazing job of producing docos and media (constant professionally-commentated live streams etc) but I never seem to see much from NASA. Sad, really.

        1. GJim · · focus · HN ↗
          > TIL the rover had a tissue-box-sized helicopter (!!) on it

          Wait until you find out that the helicopter carried a small piece of fabric from the wing of the 1903 Wright Flyer.

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wright_brothers#Wright_Brothers_Field" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wright_brothers#Wright_Brother...

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.