‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

NASA’s Mars Sample Return mission is dead

456 points · 391 comments · Muhammad523

  1. jumploops · · focus · HN ↗
    I worked on (a very small part of) the ExoMars rover (now called the Rosalind Franklin[0]).

    It was supposed to launch in 2018, then was pushed to the early 2020s on a Russian rocket. For obvious reasons, it got pushed again, now launching in 2028.

    The state of the world isn't great for space exploration, but I'm hopeful this mission will be revived at some point in the future.

    [0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rosalind_Franklin_(rover)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Rosalind_Franklin_(rover)

    1. Teever · · focus · HN ↗
      As an outsider who is very interested in space exploration I&#x27;m very flummoxed by the state of space exploration.

      With the price of launches so low compared to only 20 years ago due to advancements in launch technology and the increased cadence of launches it seems like it should be easier to do these kinds of missions and that there should be more, cheaper missions that are willing to take risks because the per mission cost is so much lower.

      Can you comment on why that doesn&#x27;t seem to be happening? Why aren&#x27;t we covering Mars in cheap rovers and satellites?

      1. Rebelgecko · · focus · HN ↗
        Outside of specifics like the space shuttle program, launch costs have never been that big of a factor. Like 5-15% of a program&#x27;s cost. If your satellite or rover costs billions to build and another billion to run for a decade, saving a hundred million (or even a couple hundred million) isn&#x27;t that much of a game changer
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.