‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Meta bans ads for Virginia Woolf play in Spain

140 points · 152 comments · uxhacker

  1. colingauvin · · focus · HN ↗
    We don't have to put up with this. We simply choose to. But our laws could be whatever we want them to be.
    1. tygon · · focus · HN ↗
      Unfortunately, "we" is often those with the monetary means to make their voice heard.
      1. ericmay · · focus · HN ↗
        Well you can also just stop using these products. I don't have or use Facebook, Instagram, Whats App, Reddit (since they removed old.reddit.com unless you have an account), TikTok, Snap, or anything else.

        Folks want Facebook or whatever to be regulated into some perfect idea they have in their heads of how it should work and how it should be regulated. Sorry, many people have many views on that, and you're never going to be happy with an outcome. Even this article - Facebook is complying with EU rules/regulations and now you're not happy that your voice isn't heard through your preferred form of political activism. If Facebook allows this content, they break EU laws, or they have to allow some content you disagree with and now you're mad.

        I don't know why people, right, left, or sideways keep putting up with this stuff.

        1. pixl97 · · focus · HN ↗
          >I don't have or use Facebook, Instagram, Whats App, Reddit

          There is a particular amount of economic privilege in this statement. While I am a person who doesn't use those services (and recently stopped using reddit), a large number of people are required to use those services for their job, so they can get money, so they can put food on the table.

          Worse these companies ingrain themselves into a lot of physical locations and data collection from other sources so your not free of them.

          Individual boycotts rarely work, even ones that attract attention from a good number of people, companies are better at waiting than individuals seem to be. Political action has a much higher likelihood of success when driven by smaller motivated groups.

          1. ericmay · · focus · HN ↗
            > There is a particular amount of economic privilege in this statement.

            Good, I am pro-privilege and support being privileged. I'm not sure how and why we came to the point in our society where if someone says "hey these products suck and I'm not going to use them", someone has to come along and attempt to guilt them into using them? You want me to create a Facebook account and post pictures of funny cats because Joe and Sally podcaster need eyeballs for their rage-bait podcasts or quirky coffee mug they drop-shipped from China?

            Sorry, not buying it. Don't like the products? Stop using them. Reliant on them? Go complain to regulators. Not my monkeys, not my circus.

            1. tygon · · focus · HN ↗
              For many, it is less silly cat pictures and more listing products for sale from a legitimate registered business (catering is a common one for example). Gotta do what you gotta do sometimes. If you do not take advantage of tools afforded to you, someone will and because social media like facebook is "free," that is a go-to.
              1. ericmay · · focus · HN ↗
                Sure, folks can do what they want. I'm not disputing that, but this idea of "privilege" in this context, to me, is quite ridiculous.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.