‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Attention is all you have

1090 points · 330 comments · zer0tonin

  1. econ · · focus · HN ↗
    The Mosaic browser (1993) had full text history search.

    We then got a bookmark system that was every bit as terrible as a web directory.

    It stayed that way. The delicious search revenue made organizing websites uninteresting. That obscure website you enjoyed a decade ago but don't even remember, they had lots of traffic like you. No point updating or keeping it online. You can't have rss in Firefox but here is a Facebook like button in your address bar in stead.

    I've tried to maintain the bookmark menu but I rarely use it since everything is dead. Why aren't browsers storing a text version of the bookmark? Did people in 1993 have more resources than us? Should I be afraid it grows to a few GB over the decades?

    A good few dead websites have a backup some place but there is no automation to find it. If you had a string of text from a page you might be able to search for it. If the page found is highly similar we might automate the process to have alternative location for bookmarks with a nice warning dialog.

    1. Shorel · · focus · HN ↗
      I have a wallabag setup for my interesting bookmarks, and it downloads and indexes the contents of these bookmarks. I read the contents later in a PocketBook, free of distractions from the normal devices. It is a bit of setup work, but just totally frictionless after it was setup. Firefox also has Pocket, which I used before switching to wallabag.
      1. raddan · · focus · HN ↗
        How does wallabag know about your bookmarks? Or do you mean that you're using a wallabag extension for firefox?
        1. Shorel · · focus · HN ↗
          I'm using a wallabag extension in every browser. Also using a wallabag app on Android. And also a wallabag app on PocketBook.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.