‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

In September, AI generated code has made up 17.25% of all Linux Kernel patches

32 points · 79 comments · tosh

  1. AyanamiKaine · · focus · HN ↗
    I really don't know what to feel about AI generated code. It's clear that it improves velocity dramatically in code output. It has some value to it. But what is the cost?

    While I code without the help of AI, sometimes I feel like I am being left behind.

    Ohh you wrote only 400 lines today? I shipped a whole app while being in the gym... hits hard.

    1. piva00 · · focus · HN ↗
      AI-assisted coding helps me a lot to churn through boilerplate, straightforward implementations, test writing, exploration of unfamiliar codebases, and other ancillary tasks in coding. It does not replace tacit knowledge/domain knowledge required to design a good solution, no matter how much of the architecture is described as documentation it cannot predict the future to have judgement about a proposed design.

      In general AI is an assistance, it doesn't replace the intellectual work that is needed for a good implementation.

      In my opinion, approach it like you'd approach any other tool: there are good use-cases for it while being definitely not the right tool for other cases.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.