Disney+: New user agreement allows ads before movies in all subscriptions
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Disney+: New user agreement allows ads before movies in all subscriptions
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
semiquaver · · focus · HN ↗
I’m all for consumer awareness but I’m begging everyone to stop freaking out over prosaic non-issues like this.
DonsDiscountGas · · focus · HN ↗
Yes I see that as an ad. Do you not? Does anyone not? And if I'm on the highest paying ad free plan, what are they promoting to me?
Gareth321 · · focus · HN ↗
* Ads in YouTube feeds for other google products and services.
* Ads underneath videos for products from the channel owner.
* Sponsorships within videos from the channel owner.
* Advertising overlays (supported IN THE APP BY GOOGLE) for products and services from the channel owner.
* Email advertisements for Google products and services.
* Community post advertisements from channel owners which show up in the YouTube feed.
I contacted support to enquire and they state these are not considered advertising.
hdgvhicv · · focus · HN ↗
Howver recently I’ve noticed adverts for “membership” for channels, and that is getting me close to picking my youtube habit. Same with Spotify and advertising concerts, but that seems to have gone away for me after I complained.
Sadly even the bbc does adverts on iPlayer. You used to be able to instantly skip them, but then in a big (internal) fanfare some idiot decided they could make them not skippable and increase some metrics and then get a promotion.
kmeisthax · · focus · HN ↗
I remember about 10-15 years ago YouTube actually did try to ban sponsor spots in videos, but the backlash from creators was strong enough that they walked that back to "ok well we'll allow sponsor spots but you can't just insert the sponsor's own ad, it's gotta be your ad read and B-roll".
Grombobulous · · focus · HN ↗
Once you’ve transitioned from an ad-watching customer to a paid one, YouTube actually turns into something that treats your product experience and satisfaction as important.
It’s fascinating how it switches that off for non-paying users. Not a lot of companies’ services do that so obviously and blatantly.
In other words, when YouTube is being watched for free, they have that typical engagement incentive: keep you watching as long as possible, watch as many ads as possible, etc.
When you’re paying? Who cares, skip the content if you want. Use Gemini to summarize it, we don’t care if you watch the video.
godshatter · · focus · HN ↗
If they don't want people watching videos without logging in, they should gate them behind a login screen rather than fucking with their users.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]