Thread

1. soonnow · 1789971698 · focus · HN ↗

   To add a b it of context. They do not want to confiscate housing. They do want to pay landlords, though below current (very high) rates. Also this would only apply to private real-estate companies not individual owners.

   And they can't govern alone, so I think it's unlikely that this plan is actually implemented as originally planned. The likely coalition would contain 3 parties.

   1. dirasieb · 1789972590 · focus · HN ↗

      >it's not confiscation, you're just forced to sell at a price i decide is fair

      sound logic

      1. bmacho · 1789974162 · focus · HN ↗

         [edit - deleted]

         1. backhold · 1789974756 · focus · HN ↗

            With the disclaimer that I am neither German nor familiar with the policy under discussion,

            Confiscation with (some) remuneration is still confiscation. Is your comment satirical?

            1. [deleted] · 1789977993 · focus · HN ↗

               [deleted]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.