‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Winning the visa lottery

112 points · 134 comments · neehao

  1. bambax · · focus · HN ↗
    > "When policy is politically polarized, you need more facts," he said.

    Mmmm... It seems in the world of politics, esp. populist politics, more facts don't bring better policies. They are simply ignored, or accused of being lies pushed by the ennemies.

    > "We have all the facts on this we need. We don't need any more facts. In the land of truth, my friend, the man with one fact is the king."

    -- Linton Barwick, In The Loop (2009)

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=PdoN1LWGgfQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=PdoN1LWGgfQ

    1. armchairhacker · · focus · HN ↗
      Sometimes they are lies. Governments including Western ones have lied before (e.g. Tuskegee Syphillis), and academics have published flawed, misleading, or straight-up fabricated studies (e.g. “landmark” Alzheimer’s study).

      But more often, the “fact” does not address the individual’s issues, and the individual may give a stupid counterargument (“…lie pushed by my enemies…”) but they have a legitimate one. In this case, I guarantee there are specific people who’ve been indisputably replaced by H1Bs, maybe clustered in specific reasons, and maybe specific fields. Telling these people “overall H1Bs create jobs” won’t convince them.

      Like telling poor people “the economy is improving, inflation is only 0.x%”. Both may be true in general at the population level, but to the person you’re speaking to, they don’t matter; economic improvements can go to others while they suffer more.

      1. dansquizsoft · · focus · HN ↗
        &gt; But more often, the “fact” does not address the individual’s issues,

        I feel like this has been a big failing of one (left) side of politics in recent years. Quick to state &#x27;facts&#x27; as arguments but those haven&#x27;t landed as well as they have in the past (15 - 20+ years ago), for whatever reasons...

        1. M95D · · focus · HN ↗
          One reason is in the article: less immigration does not lead to more native employment. I can also assume that it has no effect on salaries, too. There is an argument in there that more immigration =&gt; more jobs for the natives, but it doesn&#x27;t say if those jobs are the same as the ones for immigrants, and I assume they&#x27;re not, they&#x27;re management jobs to oversee the immigrants.

          As a conclusion, immigration does not affect low skilled jobs in any way. No matter what the politicians propose, increase immigration or decrease immigration, their situation is more or less the same.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.