Did you get a chance to read the paper? Did you read Section VII and footnote 51? If so, do you still believe that the article is "clamoring for more 'cheap' labor?"
And what other issues would you like to see besides housing and employment in the article?
ralph84 · · focus · HN ↗
> not found
Yet another chamber of commerce article clamoring for more cheap labor without addressing where all of these people are supposed to live.
grubbydiff · · focus · HN ↗
And what other issues would you like to see besides housing and employment in the article?