‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Amiga Unix, Again

144 points · 67 comments · doener

  1. breput · · focus · HN ↗
    I ran NetBSD 0.8 on my Amiga 500 (with a 68030 w/MMU, 68881, and SCSI hard drive sidecar), which co-existed in the same timeframe as Commodore's release.

    Other than just than "we can" and historic interest, I can't imagine why anyone would choose to run System Vr4 over 4.4BSD, especially since the latest NetBSD 11 release still fully supports Amiga[0]

    [0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.netbsd.org&#x2F;ports&#x2F;amiga&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.netbsd.org&#x2F;ports&#x2F;amiga&#x2F;

    1. rbanffy · · focus · HN ↗
      &gt; I can&#x27;t imagine why anyone would choose to run System Vr4

      With X, using an Amiga 3000&#x2F;4000 as a daily driver is possible. I did use an IBM PowerPC 43P as a daily driver under AIX 3.1 for a long while (until I gave up on having ssh working on it).

      The 43P was, however, paired to a humongous Intergraph CRT that I can&#x27;t move across a national border because of the amount of rare earths used to make it, and was a very ample desktop for the 2010s. Until the advent of 4K monitors, I didn&#x27;t have anything beating that - on a VGA connection. The Amiga is far more limited than that.

      In terms of vintage Unix desktops, it&#x27;s hard to beat Acorn&#x27;s RISC&#x2F;iX with its IXI desktop. I believe Atari Unix also had something similarly cool.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.