‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

What happened to the Snowden archive

728 points · 599 comments · EXHades

  1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
    People became ambivalent. Snowden fled eventually to Russia. Some people viewed him less relevant over time as the archive merely trickled out. When he fled to Russia, he looked less like a martyr and more like a national security information leaker or spy like Robert

    A lot of what sounded extraordinary in 2013 is now baked into everyday discussion like metadata and mass surveillance. He is also available less for interviews because he is in Russia.

    Basically bigger fish to fry

    1. unsungNovelty · · focus · HN ↗
      He didn't "flee" to Russia. His passport was renounced/revoked/disabled while he was on his way to the original destination. He got stuck in the Russian airport for a freaking long time in a small room while the govt made sure he can't go anywhere else. Good Lord, fled to Russia it seems.
      1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
        He could have returned to the US. He chose to exile in Russia. He was already fleeing. I posted a bunch about it below
        1. unsungNovelty · · focus · HN ↗
          Snowden has repeatedly talked about why he wouldn't return to US cos the trial won't be fair. He wanted to be able to talk. But due to his role, the trial would be a muppet one where he can't even talk. Or am I wrong?

          At the time, look at the situation of Chelsea Manning, Julian Assange and the many whistle blowers before Snowden? How can u blame him?

          Edit: Am unable to reply to comments. HN don't let you comment 2-3 levels in or is it moderation? - Fixed.

          1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
            The problem is he can’t excuse the offense under the Espionage Act because it doesn’t have a public interest defense. One could argue that it should have that defense. But that doesn’t mean the resulting trial would have been a “muppet trial”

            He could have had counsel, challenged the government, and had a jury decide guilt. It would have been fair. It actually looks worse to flee like he did

            1. unsungNovelty · · focus · HN ↗
              "doesn't have a public interest defence".

              Can't be serious.

              1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
                There isn’t one under the law so no.

                Why wasn’t the whistleblower process followed? Why didn’t he try to contact his congressman/ senator ? He could have said I don’t want a clearance anymore and disclosed his concerns. He could have reported anonymously even.

                He wanted public debate and discourse on something that the process didn’t allow

                1. unsungNovelty · · focus · HN ↗
                  What he exposed was found illegal by US courts. And the govt had to stop it. What more evidence do you want?
                  1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
                    Only one program went beyond what was originally authorized and shutdown. The rest had no basis to be leaked. It caused grave damage to the national security of the US. Those programs had nothing to do with the privacy of American citizens that everyone keeps latching on here. They are ignoring the rest of the stuff
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.