‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

What happened to the Snowden archive

728 points · 599 comments · EXHades

  1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
    People became ambivalent. Snowden fled eventually to Russia. Some people viewed him less relevant over time as the archive merely trickled out. When he fled to Russia, he looked less like a martyr and more like a national security information leaker or spy like Robert

    A lot of what sounded extraordinary in 2013 is now baked into everyday discussion like metadata and mass surveillance. He is also available less for interviews because he is in Russia.

    Basically bigger fish to fry

    1. anonym29 · · focus · HN ↗
      He didn't flee to Russia. He had booked tickets to Ecuador going through Russia. The Obama administration revoked his passport, rendering him stateless and unable to leave Russia. Please do not regurgitate propaganda.
      1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
        He actually fled the US before the leaks became public to Hong Kong but it was a calculated risk because Hong Kong has extradition treaty with the US. So he was fleeing already.

        He could have returned to the US however he would have most certainly faced arrest. So he asked and was granted temporary asylum in Russia. If my passport is voided for whatever reason then I am returning to the US. I am still a citizen and so was he.

        But naturally he didn’t want to be arrested so by definition became a fugitive.

        1. BLKNSLVR · · focus · HN ↗
          > I am still a citizen and so was he.

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;False_equivalence" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;False_equivalence

          1. firesteelrain · · focus · HN ↗
            I get it I didn’t leak national security information but it doesn’t change the fact that he wasn’t stateless. That’s the part I was referring to
            1. BLKNSLVR · · focus · HN ↗
              That just feels like a slightly different false equivalence - and having said that, I may be making yet another version of it by saying this:

              If a person has a &#x27;state&#x27;, but that state would immediately jail the person for treason upon their return, is that materially different to stateless?

              That feels like the reason that many countries allow &#x27;political asylum&#x27;.

              1. iamnothere · · focus · HN ↗
                I see what you’re saying, but true stateless people often have a different problem on their hands, because most countries won’t allow them entry at all unless they can get refugee status, and they will often be denied basic rights.

                Some people actually voluntarily seek statelessness, but they’re either crazy or have enough resources to fly under the radar somewhere.

                See <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Statelessness" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Statelessness

                Snowden’s status is more of a political exile. Theoretically he could return legally and safely if there was a complete regime change where the new regime was aligned with his beliefs and actions, although the chances of this happening are approximately zero.

                1. BLKNSLVR · · focus · HN ↗
                  Yeah, Snowden was lucky he wasn&#x27;t, by definition, stateless, otherwise Russia may not have offered him asylum. They got to piss off the US by doing so.
                  1. ShinyLeftPad · · focus · HN ↗
                    Russia offers asylum to stateless people.

                    The only problem with getting asylum anywhere while being stateless is proving who you are. And it wasn&#x27;t a problem for him.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.