This argument should be reframed as "AI has the potential to cause catastrophic loss of life". It's too high of a bar to prove that AI will "wipe out humanity". It's sorta like climate change, it's easier to show that weather patterns are becoming increasingly dangerous.
not just, its also very likley to be the tool used to create civil unrest and even war.
the damage it can do to the masses by misinformation or ragebating by feeding everyone its own paticular echo chamber is was too often not even spoken about.
Agreed, and while I want to see AGI come into existence, I'm also for policies aimed at harm reduction. This doesn't have to be an all or nothing form of argument.
So far after using agents and having built an agent, the "AI will destroy humanity" argument seems to be a marketing ploy so these companies that lied about LLM's capabilities and received billions in investments can artificially "slow down progress" after running into some serious limitations. I'm not expert and won't claim to be, but that just sounds like the reality at the moment. Will AI cause some serious harm to the job market and cause more wealth disparity though? So far all signs point to yes.
Or is it to lobby for restrictive rules on AI research that only the largest firms can hope to comply with? And "only coincidentally" ends up outlawing open source / open weight / import of overseas AI models?
infinite_spin · · focus · HN ↗
senectus1 · · focus · HN ↗
the damage it can do to the masses by misinformation or ragebating by feeding everyone its own paticular echo chamber is was too often not even spoken about.
infinite_spin · · focus · HN ↗
4fddd3 · · focus · HN ↗
We already have this today. It can't get any worse.
Just like the scaremongering of GPT2 - muhh it may lead to lots of spam!!! Bro that's already here.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
senectus1 · · focus · HN ↗
lol
you aint seen nuthin yet.
hackeraccount · · focus · HN ↗
jsbisviewtiful · · focus · HN ↗
m3galinux · · focus · HN ↗
williamse · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]