‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Bill to Ban Private Equity from Owning Medical Practices

509 points · 384 comments · paimapi

  1. NegativeK · · focus · HN ↗
    Can someone steelman private equity, please? I'm honestly looking for the upsides (for non-investors) of when PE moves into an industry like medicine and begins buying up businesses that traditionally aren't already large chains.

    I already hear the downsides frequently from someone whose work is directly affected.

    1. mhh__ · · focus · HN ↗
      PE staff are more intelligent and more shrewd than the people running the businesses they buy. Being a good doctor doesn't make you a good businessman.

      I'm not a huge fan of PE but the point of economics to deliver cheap and quality goods to consumers not keep people in a job.

      In healthcare in US in particular I think the main thing that capital should be (if regulators allow) boutique / specialists that e.g. are the best in the biz at doing MRI scans, in some states my understanding is that it's literally illegal to start a business aiming to make one small part of the process better.

      1. cool_dude85 · · focus · HN ↗
        What does it mean in this context to be more intelligent and shrewd than the existing owners? Delivering better profit margins?
        1. ChickeNES · · focus · HN ↗
          There's more than one form of intelligence, and being good at fixing people doesn't necessarily correlate with managing a business. As silly as it sounds, watching Shark Tank will really demonstrate that someone can have a legitimately great idea, but if they aren't business minded, it wont matter.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.