Thread

1. throwaway13337 · 1789952505 · focus · HN ↗

   There's a pattern to the kinds of companies PE buys and I think it points to the real problem.

   They like companies with some kind of moat that makes it hard to unseat them. Basically, companies where there is no alternative for the consumer. That way, they can inflict abuse but know there will be nowhere to run.

   There are two different ways to achieve this. Monopoly and regulation. Hospitals have both government granted locational monopoly and tons of regulations that make it impossible to compete.

   Private equity is the symptom, not the disease.

   Until we get at the disease, new monsters will be born with different name filling the same ecological niche. It's economic natural selection played out in the environment we created.

   1. Waterluvian · 1789953119 · focus · HN ↗

      The Americans simply will not reject their broken for-profit medical system wholesale. What I see is one more attempt at chipping away at it in hopes that maybe they can succeed piecemeal.

      1. claytongulick · 1789955671 · focus · HN ↗

         I'm not sure anyone has solved the problem, though.

         "For profit" isn't really the problem, fee for service is.

         Value based arrangements and capitated payment structures are real improvements.

         When you don't have any market forces constraining utilization, you get massive access problems.

         1. robmccoll · 1789957747 · focus · HN ↗

            The United States has both market forces and massive access problems. I'm not sure you can establish that causal relationship.

            1. georgemcbay · 1789959090 · focus · HN ↗

               > The United States has both market forces and massive access problems.

               It boggles my mind when I still occasionally hear people speaking out against all forms of single payer healthcare in the US saying they don't want to have to wait weeks/months to see a doctor like they do in Canada/UK/wherever.

               If I give them the benefit of the doubt of not being paid lobbyists for the medical insurance industry, I can only surmise these people haven't been to a non-emergency doctor since prior to 2020.

               Because even here in the US if you aren't fabulously wealthy with concierge medical you'll be waiting weeks/months to see a 'doctor'. And you'll almost certainly never actually see a doctor, you're going to see an overworked NP (no shade on NPs here, most of whom are great, just establishing how our medical system actually works in 2026).

               1. milesskorpen · 1789960481 · focus · HN ↗

                  This is not my family's experience on distinctly not-concierge-medicine Kaiser Permanente in the Bay Area. Always meet with doctors (and NPs), have gotten in quickly when necessary, etc.

                  1. stephenhuey · 1789963425 · focus · HN ↗

                     California is the only state that regulates wait times for specialists. When you uttered the words "Bay Area" it signaled that you enjoy better service than most Americans. I know people in states very close to yours (as well as my own) who have had extensive wait times.

                     1. JumpCrisscross · 1790000576 · focus · HN ↗

                        > California is the only state that regulates wait times for specialists

                        Really?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.