‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Bill to Ban Private Equity from Owning Medical Practices

509 points · 384 comments · paimapi

  1. NegativeK · · focus · HN ↗
    Can someone steelman private equity, please? I'm honestly looking for the upsides (for non-investors) of when PE moves into an industry like medicine and begins buying up businesses that traditionally aren't already large chains.

    I already hear the downsides frequently from someone whose work is directly affected.

    1. twoodfin · · focus · HN ↗
      The upside is to the folks who sold the businesses they owned.

      Should they be outlawed from selling to certain classes of investor? Which?

      1. Grombobulous · · focus · HN ↗
        It should be more about making certain levels of consolidation and deep erosion of local ownership illegal.

        We have run this country on an assumption that we must give businesses a high amount of freedom. An argument can be made that businesses have been given too much freedom in our system. We’ve allowed Amazon and Ticketmaster and Walmart to exist and they shouldn’t exist in their present form.

        Healthcare practices that provide necessary care shouldn’t even really be allowed to be for-profit entities if you ask me. The incentives become too perverse as a result.

        1. gruez · · focus · HN ↗
          >Healthcare practices that provide necessary care shouldn’t even really be allowed to be for-profit entities if you ask me. The incentives become too perverse as a result.

          Why stop at healthcare? Why not other essentials of life, like food or toilet paper?

          1. Grombobulous · · focus · HN ↗
            You’re absolutely right. For example, we’ve seen the negative impacts from excessive agricultural consolidation.

            Many of them already lack profitability without subsidy.

            Many agricultural products all pass through the same mega-sized processors and entities. Driscoll’s, Tyson, etc.

            We’ve already made things like water and sanitation non-profit/government owned so the idea of doing more of that for food and essentials isn’t that crazy.

            1. gruez · · focus · HN ↗
              >You’re absolutely right. For example, we’ve seen the negative impacts from excessive agricultural consolidation.

              Like what?

              >Many of them already lack profitability without subsidy.

              That doesn't mean anything without context. How are the non-PE farms doing?

              >We’ve already made things like water and sanitation non-profit/government owned so the idea of doing more of that for food and essentials isn’t that crazy.

              sanitation: please see <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Waste_Management,_Inc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Waste_Management,_Inc.

              water, but not power, or natural gas?

              1. pixl97 · · focus · HN ↗
                &gt;Like what?

                <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2026&#x2F;07&#x2F;09&#x2F;nx-s1-5885008&#x2F;department-of-justice-charges-three-major-egg-suppliers-with-price-fixing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2026&#x2F;07&#x2F;09&#x2F;nx-s1-5885008&#x2F;department-of-j...

                When consolidation happens collusion always follows, along with higher prices, and fines that are a tiny part of the total gain.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.