‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Nobody pays for FOSS, we can force them to

196 points · 209 comments · Muhammad523

  1. otterley · · focus · HN ↗
    If you want people to pay you for your software, stop writing it for free. Conversely, if you write it for free, don't expect people to pay you for it. Otherwise you are no better than someone at an intersection with a bottle of Windex and a squeegee who, unsolicited, cleans a windshield and then demands the driver to pay for it.

    The original authors of Free Software and open source were career academics and others who were paid to do other things, or were sponsored by scientific and defense research grants. I don't know how anyone got the nutty idea that you could make money on FOSS itself. Practically every time someone has tried to make money on FOSS it has failed.

    (Edit: this comment previously ended with "...from Netscape on down.")

    1. pyuser583 · · focus · HN ↗
      Open source was never about doing stuff for free - at least not originally.

      It’s about the definition of ownership. What does it mean to own a program?

      When you distribute the program, you must also distribute the code for it. That’s open source.

      1. otterley · · focus · HN ↗
        It's not about the definition of ownership, either. The author of FOSS software retains ownership, unless they explicitly convey it to someone else.

        It's about how software is licensed--the terms and conditions under which someone can make a copy. That's why it's called the GNU Public License, or the MIT License, and why there's a LICENSE file.

        The mere act of copying does not convey ownership, and never has.

        1. GrinningFool · · focus · HN ↗
          I think the license was the best tool available for the ideology around ownership.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.