‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Nobody pays for FOSS, we can force them to

196 points · 209 comments · Muhammad523

  1. haunter · · focus · HN ↗
    I'm not sure it fits the free and/or libre software philosophy but I'm a big fan of releasing otherwise free and open source software as a paid version and with some exclusive QoL features in proprietary store fronts.

    For example Krita. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;krita.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;download&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;krita.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;download&#x2F; FOSS but you can buy it on Steam, Microsoft Store, Epic Store, and Apple Store. You get one exclusive feature, automatic updates (and more recently Steam Cloud sync support), and you also support the developers (on the other hand Valve, MS, Epic, and Apple also gets a cut too).

    If you read for example the Steam reviews everyone points out that it&#x27;s a free software but buying on Steam is also a good and very importantly straightforward way to support the devs + the platform itself has such a pull (&quot;buying games you never play&quot;) that people buy it just for the case of having it in their library

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;store.steampowered.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;280680&#x2F;Krita" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;store.steampowered.com&#x2F;app&#x2F;280680&#x2F;Krita

    1. dataflow · · focus · HN ↗
      The free software philosophy aside, I feel like another problem is that once you start accepting payments then you start accepting various forms of responsibility&#x2F;liability&#x2F;accountability&#x2F;etc. along with it. At a high enough price it&#x27;d become worth it, but that might not be anywhere near the price that your customers&#x2F;users want to support you at.
      1. singpolyma3 · · focus · HN ↗
        Maybe but lots of $2 apps exist from random devs who don&#x27;t take much responsibility.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.