Thread

1. osiris970 · 1789941014 · focus · HN ↗

   Are we still pretending models aren't cyber capable, and will be an immense force for hacking? I expected this shit on reddit not here. You don't have to like Sam, and still not do this bullshit

   1. bogzz · 1789941260 · focus · HN ↗

      The fearmongering is based in the notion that the LessWrong fanfic is coming true as we speak, not LLMs being used as tools for hacking.

      1. arctic-true · 1789942218 · focus · HN ↗

         Unfortunately focusing on the fanfic prevents everyone from focusing on the genuinely world-altering threat of cybersecurity becoming completely impossible for a while. But perhaps that’s the point, because you can be held liable for that, but not for the end of the world as there wouldn’t be any courts afterward.
   2. vinyl7 · 1789943763 · focus · HN ↗

      It would be more believable if the AI companies success wasn't entirely dependent on regulatory capture
   3. hulitu · 1790062208 · focus · HN ↗

      > Are we still pretending models aren't cyber capable

      They can add 2 + 2 correctly in 10% of cases. So, no, they are not.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.