Thread

1. jgalt212 · 1789935244 · focus · HN ↗

   There is really is no excuse for Washington here. Even for the layperson+, it doesn't take much use of an LLM to figure out where they produce good and usable results and where it's of specious of value.

   + every layperson is an expert in 1 or more areas.

   1. randallsquared · 1789936730 · focus · HN ↗

      > every layperson is an expert in 1 or more areas.

      This isn't even remotely true, unless you're willing to go as far as "being this person is an area of expertise".

      1. sublinear · 1789937056 · focus · HN ↗

         Neither of you is wrong? Every lived experience does produce a unique expertise, not in "being" that person, but navigating their experiences. It would be very unusual that all of someone's experiences are completely worthless.

         I suppose you've never had a unique perspective on something? Maybe that reflects on your self esteem? How unfortunate.

      2. basch · 1789937469 · focus · HN ↗

         I dont have to be an expert to recognize when something is said with authority and confidence. Any time a model says something with conviction, my instinct is to double check.

         Now if they taught them to express uncertainty and speak in terms of probability, I might be more likely to be blindly fooled by some kind of uncertain conviction.

      3. jgalt212 · 1789943780 · focus · HN ↗

         > This isn't even remotely true

         That's quite an extraordinary claim there which I doubt would hold up to an even cursory level of scrutiny. But if you yell it loud enough, maybe people will be afraid to challenge your assertion.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.