‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

MCP was always a bad idea?

335 points · 331 comments · maharshi365

  1. wetpaste · · focus · HN ↗
    I think a most interesting middle ground option is the advent of CLIs specifically with agents in mind.

    For example, grafana has a newer CLI called gcx that replaced grafanactl <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grafana.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;grafana&#x2F;latest&#x2F;as-code&#x2F;observability-as-code&#x2F;grafana-cli&#x2F;gcx&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grafana.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;grafana&#x2F;latest&#x2F;as-code&#x2F;observabilit...

    I originally used the MCP server but after running into context bloat and limitations around MCP I looked and found this. Seems to be a fantastic interface for agents, they breeze through o11y tasks with this thing.

    1. georgeburdell · · focus · HN ↗
      Agreed, had a coworker come to this same conclusion and now only distributes CLIs. I think it’s solid as long as the decision tree of which tools do what is fairly simple. Perhaps MCPs were just overused before
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.