Resident Evil 4 (GameCube) – complete byte-identical decompilation to C/C++
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Resident Evil 4 (GameCube) – complete byte-identical decompilation to C/C++
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
LaurensBER · · focus · HN ↗
From a technical perspective emulation is absolutely amazing, it requires deep technical knowledge, an excellent understanding of the source system and the optimisations are on another level.
NobodyNada · · focus · HN ↗
So having Claude one-shot a NES emulator is almost pointless to me. You're using and looking at source code for an emulator you didn't write -- and you can learn from that, but it's not the same thing and doesn't require you to really understand a CPU the way you would by, say, observing a deviation in game behavior and staring at trace logs to figure out the exact instruction you emulated incorrectly.
It's not all bad -- AI is a great research tool and can automate some of the tedious parts (writing out an instruction decoder by hand is miserable). But using it to just...skip over the effort of doing a project defeats the whole purpose of doing those projects in the first place.
I don't want to be gatekeepy or curmudgeonly or "back in my day..." about it. But for me, my entire career path is due to skills and knowledge I learned spending several years of my life as a teenager figuring out how to write an NES emulator as a relative beginner to programming. And so I feel like using AI for this is depriving the next generation of that learning process. In addition, there are only so many retro games, and fewer popular ones. There's only so much unexplored territory to discover, and doing it with AI deprives another person of that experience and deprives that game's community of someone who might have been able to find a "home" working on projects related to that game.
mw888 · · focus · HN ↗
You are clearly a wizard of a prior era. But it is a new era.
breezybottom · · focus · HN ↗
cassonmars · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=3439" rel="nofollow">https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=3439
"For this invention will produce forgetfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, because they will not practice their memory. Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage the use of their own memory within them. You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem [275b] to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise."
shakna · · focus · HN ↗
This is a political critique, on the rule of law (writing) over attempting to treat things on a case by case basis (philosophy).
Quoting it, without understanding it, is part of that author's complaint.