‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

US Revokes Limits on Power Plants' Climate Pollution

261 points · 266 comments · DeepLogin

  1. reactordev · · focus · HN ↗
    Full steam ahead towards greenhouse gases, climate change, and +5degree temperatures. Why not?
    1. sippingabonedry · · focus · HN ↗
      Sorry but you can't have EVs everywhere, WA and CA banning natural gas for heat and cooking, WA and OR sabotaging hydro plant output for salmon habitat restoration, while shutting down your most reliable sources of power. The math does not add up.

      Solar and wind output is not constant or reliable. NIMBYs sabotaged nuclear years ago. It takes how many years to bring a new plant online?

      A lot of feel-good rules and regs were passed, pushing a massive shift to electric power, with no consideration as to where the additional power would come from.

      You can't wave your arms like a Peanuts cartoon and have all that extra power appear, which is the logic that was used in passing many of these impractical regulations.

      1. jsbisviewtiful · · focus · HN ↗
        What an opinion to have when thus far evidence has concluded the opposite. Just because funding for the infrastructure keeps getting derailed, delayed and lied about by bad actors doesn’t make the anti-renewable parrots correct. There are situations where —at minimum- hybrid solutions are far more viable options but for many locations just those two solutions work very well.
        1. sippingabonedry · · focus · HN ↗
          > Just because funding for the infrastructure keeps getting derailed, delayed and lied about by bad actors

          Speaking of infrastructure, how about pushing a mass rollout of EVs before giving a single consideration as to where the charging infra would come from?

          1. wat10000 · · focus · HN ↗
            Are you from the past?
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.