‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

US Revokes Limits on Power Plants' Climate Pollution

261 points · 266 comments · DeepLogin

  1. jmward01 · · focus · HN ↗
    There are a multitude of arguments against this:

    - Investing in alternatives has led to massive new industry that is improving the economy of those countries that do it. If your argument is an economic one then jump onto the solar, wind and battery bandwagon.

    - There are virtually no real short medium or long term gains economically here. Gas is the only thing still competitive with solar/wind and its costs are rising while solar and wind continue to fall. Building new maximum pollution plants would drop that internalized cost but who in their right mind would fund something so obviously DOA?

    - Obviously the externalized costs of greenhouse gas emissions are deeply undervalued in this move. Even if they are 'fake news' in the US, the rest of the world is finally starting to take them seriously. The US's diminished soft power means it won't be able to easily bully the world into allowing it to pollute without consequence and such an obviously hostile move means it will loose even more of its soft power by taking this position. So on the international level this means we burn a lot of political capital and gain nothing but decades of distrust and anger.

    - Current events show that energy security is dominated by decoupling from fossil fuels. This weakens the US strategically and continues to set it up to be manipulated by exceptionally hostile actors.

    - Oh yeah and, of course, climate change is real.

    This continues the US down the path of being the best buggy whip maker in the world. Worse than that, the US is becoming an obnoxious buggy whip maker who's neighbors are starting to hope fails horribly and will help make that happen as moves like this continue. This is stupid at every scale and in every dimension.

    1. nine_k · · focus · HN ↗
      The current wars in Europe and the Middle East paradoxically push the world towards non-fossil enery like few things did before. Both oil and natural gas prices have skyrocketed on global markets, and will likely rise more, as Ukraine continues to target Russian oil infrastructure, and Houtis continue to stymie Saudi oil exports.

      Nothing hampers solar, wind, and batteries though; at worst it takes longer to ship the key components from China to Europe around Africa.

      1. PorciiVorbesc · · focus · HN ↗
        >Nothing hampers solar, wind, and batteries though; at worst it takes longer to ship the key components from China to Europe around Africa.

        Except you know, all the actual mining and manufacturing of those things, which isn't in the west but mostly in China.

        1. dalyons · · focus · HN ↗
          so what if theyre made in china?
          1. PorciiVorbesc · · focus · HN ↗

              So what if all our oil comes from the middle east?
            
              So what if all our gas comes from Russia?
            
              So what if all chips are made in Taiwan?
            
              So what if all mobile platforms are from the US?
            
            Hopefully the penny will start to drop. Any minute now.
            1. thatfrenchguy · · focus · HN ↗
              Except you burn the oil once and keep the solar panel and batteries for one or two decades
              1. rightnutwingjob · · focus · HN ↗
                You burn a battery only once, too.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.