‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Prompts aren’t Real

118 points · 57 comments · mcfunley

  1. cortesoft · · focus · HN ↗
    I hope the future of AI isn't this sort, where companies provide the user/customer with an interface to an AI that can do things for the user... I would much prefer that companies instead provide an interface FOR an AI, and the user brings their own AI which connects to that interface.

    In other words, provide my AI with tools, instead of providing me an AI that uses your tools.

    That way, my AI can bring all the context it needs, and I can bring all of the settings and knowledge about what I want with me. I don't want a fractured world of tons of AIs i interact with where I have to explain all the fundamental information about what I want and how I work every time.

    This also has the benefit of sidestepping the issue the essay is talking about. You provide a consistent tool, and the AI weirdness is not your issue anymore. You don't have to worry about solving for all the weird ways people prompt the AI, or the ways they break.

    1. gizmo686 · · focus · HN ↗
      At that point, companies could just provide an API and let users bring their own user agent, be it AI or traditional.

      The problem is that history has shown that companies really do not want to do that. They will happily pay to maintain an inferior interface and go out of their way to disrupt third party clients.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.