Boogu-Image has the Apache 2.0 License [1] (good coherence, but outputs can look synthetic).
And Krea 2 has a community license [2] that is fairly permissive - I think commercial usage is allowed under $1 million.
Boogu-Image scored 6/15 and Krea 2 scored 7/15 on my GenAI Showdown benchmark [3] - only Ideogram4 eclipses them in terms of local models, but its got a far more restrictive license and the JSON structured inputs can be a pain to work with.
jfoster · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwen#List_of_models" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qwen#List_of_models
Unfortunately, it looks like this model is using a much more restrictive license:
<a href="https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen-Image-2.1/blob/main/LICENSE" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen-Image-2.1/blob/main/LICENSE
plufz · · focus · HN ↗
vunderba · · focus · HN ↗
And Krea 2 has a community license [2] that is fairly permissive - I think commercial usage is allowed under $1 million.
Boogu-Image scored 6/15 and Krea 2 scored 7/15 on my GenAI Showdown benchmark [3] - only Ideogram4 eclipses them in terms of local models, but its got a far more restrictive license and the JSON structured inputs can be a pain to work with.
[1] - <a href="https://github.com/Boogu-Project/Boogu-Image" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Boogu-Project/Boogu-Image
[2] - <a href="https://www.krea.ai/krea-2-licensing" rel="nofollow">https://www.krea.ai/krea-2-licensing
[3] - <a href="https://genai-showdown.specr.net/?models=fd,hd,kd,qi,f2d,zt,id4,k2,sxj,bg1" rel="nofollow">https://genai-showdown.specr.net/?models=fd,hd,kd,qi,f2d,zt,...