All of the latest big proofs were driven by professional human mathematicians steering and priming the models, yes.
All of the best AI-made software projects are also driven by experienced human software developers steering and priming the models. Does that mean the projects "aren't made by AI"?
No, it just means AI is not quite good enough yet to fully replace humans, and, so, unsurprisingly, the best results will be obtained from people who are already great at a field and who take the time to squeeze as much force multiplication out of LLMs as possible. The AI is still doing well over 95% of the significant work.
> All of the best AI-made software projects are also driven by experienced human software developers steering and priming the models. Does that mean the projects "aren't made by AI"? No
Software devs steer and prime compilers too. Those tools don't "make the project" and nor does your so-called AI.
Read any blogs or watch any podcasts from high-skill programmers who are now using AI for everything. They themselves will freely say the AI is doing nearly everything, and that they often are not even reviewing the code, and when they do they just leave it as-is. Every few months you should expect humans to have less and less of an active role in software development, beyond initial ideation and UX sensibility.
rahidz · · focus · HN ↗
Also >July 4th, 2023
rusk · · focus · HN ↗
meowface · · focus · HN ↗
All of the best AI-made software projects are also driven by experienced human software developers steering and priming the models. Does that mean the projects "aren't made by AI"?
No, it just means AI is not quite good enough yet to fully replace humans, and, so, unsurprisingly, the best results will be obtained from people who are already great at a field and who take the time to squeeze as much force multiplication out of LLMs as possible. The AI is still doing well over 95% of the significant work.
chrisjj · · focus · HN ↗
Software devs steer and prime compilers too. Those tools don't "make the project" and nor does your so-called AI.
meowface · · focus · HN ↗
chrisjj · · focus · HN ↗
I prefer to judge by results.
> They themselves will freely say the AI is doing nearly everything
Of course they will.
> and that they often are not even reviewing the code
Indeed the best way to be satisfied by a chatbot's output is never to read it.