‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The LLMentalist Effect (2023)

235 points · 309 comments · jalev

  1. rahidz · · focus · HN ↗
    Man I remember back when a psychic conned me by solving the Navier-Stokes problem.

    Also >July 4th, 2023

    1. krupan · · focus · HN ↗
      The LLM did not solve it. It's not intelligent. Humans did, using a statistics-based computational tool (the LLM). We don't even know all the details of how the tool was used, we haven't been allowed to use the exact tool they used ourselves, we don't know much it really cost in dollars, energy, or time, etc. etc.
      1. claytongulick · · focus · HN ↗
        And it may have trained on a NYU professor's work.
        1. gf000 · · focus · HN ↗
          Who was looking at a subset of the problem, far from what got published by OpenAI in the end.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.