They are human institutions above all. Saying 'we're a corporation' doesn't at all absolve them from human traits, consequences, and responsibilities.
A group already (sort-of) has for the broader theory: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21691" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21691
It's a good list, but "alignment" is much more targetted. I attended a workshop with researchers from OpenAI and Anthropic also present, where the objective was to hash out what the problems in alignment even are. This, it turned out, was extraordinarily difficult.
The problems with alignment are to do with how we define and search for this vague notion when it is mathematically ill-posed at present.
I was gonna write "Implement the three laws of robotics", but then I remembered that the point of the short stories is that there are a number of loopholes...
doctoboggan · · focus · HN ↗
daveguy · · focus · HN ↗
alansaber · · focus · HN ↗
pixl97 · · focus · HN ↗
mmooss · · focus · HN ↗
an0malous · · focus · HN ↗
throwup238 · · focus · HN ↗
hodgehog11 · · focus · HN ↗
It's a good list, but "alignment" is much more targetted. I attended a workshop with researchers from OpenAI and Anthropic also present, where the objective was to hash out what the problems in alignment even are. This, it turned out, was extraordinarily difficult.
The problems with alignment are to do with how we define and search for this vague notion when it is mathematically ill-posed at present.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
aleph_minus_one · · focus · HN ↗
Rather: Someone should make the millennium problems for human alignment so the top researchers will actually try to solve that problem. :-)
a83ndoija9isjd · · focus · HN ↗
busssard · · focus · HN ↗
vjvjvjvjghv · · focus · HN ↗
aaron695 · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
mettamage · · focus · HN ↗
I hope you are right.
wise_blood · · focus · HN ↗