If AI coding is lowering your code quality, you're not managing quality right
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
If AI coding is lowering your code quality, you're not managing quality right
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
axegon_ · · focus · HN ↗
skybrian · · focus · HN ↗
I’m doubtful that the author’s recommendation always work, but I do some similar things and they do seem to help.
malfist · · focus · HN ↗
deterministic · · focus · HN ↗
Sorry, but you are 100% wrong.
I have 30+ years of professional development experience working on complex, very large-scale C++ code used by companies around the world.
I care deeply about code quality and always have. More than any other developer I've worked with in my 30+ year career. And I'm now using Claude Code to push the quality bar much higher.
But you have to learn how to use it properly. It's a tool. Quality doesn't happen automatically.
It's a big mistake, and frankly quite arrogant, to assume that because it doesn't work for you, it can't work for anyone else. Or that the rest of us must either be lying or incompetent.
player1234 · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
blub · · focus · HN ↗
deterministic · · focus · HN ↗
However, if you’re willing to share how you’re prompting the AI and some examples of where you think the results are poor, we might be able to help identify what’s causing the difference. I’d be genuinely interested in understanding why we’re getting such different results.
Rather than assuming one of us must be wrong, it would be more useful to compare approaches and see what we can learn from each other.