Is that sarcasm, or do you really need 20 of them? I'm an avid news reader, and there is no way I could get through even a fraction of that number of news sources daily.
And isn't most major news covered by every one of the biggest news sources - one great source can accommodate the vast majority of news topics for someone, especially if they are on a tight budget.
> do you really need 20 of them ... no way I could get through even a fraction of that
We actually kind of need more than that. It is like here: we collectively select through ranking a number of pieces - but they are scattered (on a.com and b.org and c.info...).
I would also like to read through the whole of the Economist and the FT etc. - what we do instead is select what we read, and what we pick will come from many sources.
dmortin · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://www.wsj.com/business/entrepreneurship/burned-out-and-unemployed-young-people-in-china-are-launching-ai-startups-c5ebcdc3" rel="nofollow">https://www.wsj.com/business/entrepreneurship/burned-out-and...
Error: Invalid InterceptionId.
cluckindan · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidan...
apexalpha · · focus · HN ↗
Well except paying $300 a month I guess.
javier2 · · focus · HN ↗
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
no-name-here · · focus · HN ↗
And isn't most major news covered by every one of the biggest news sources - one great source can accommodate the vast majority of news topics for someone, especially if they are on a tight budget.
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
mdp2021 · · focus · HN ↗
We actually kind of need more than that. It is like here: we collectively select through ranking a number of pieces - but they are scattered (on a.com and b.org and c.info...).
I would also like to read through the whole of the Economist and the FT etc. - what we do instead is select what we read, and what we pick will come from many sources.