> including the site using editors' and readers' computers to run a denial-of-service attack
This seems like sufficient justification not only to censor it at a state level, but to criminally prosecute any individual who visits the site after finding out about it - and thus knowingly joins in DDOS attacks.
cluckindan · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidan...
sunaookami · · focus · HN ↗
cluckindan · · focus · HN ↗
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
ctenb · · focus · HN ↗
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
iamnothere · · focus · HN ↗
mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
iamnothere · · focus · HN ↗
MC995 · · focus · HN ↗
trashb · · focus · HN ↗
Additionally it is against Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the UN. And Article 20 of the Spanish Constitution.
gpm · · focus · HN ↗
This seems like sufficient justification not only to censor it at a state level, but to criminally prosecute any individual who visits the site after finding out about it - and thus knowingly joins in DDOS attacks.
Toslink · · focus · HN ↗
[dead]