‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Step 5 Preview: Advancing the Pareto Frontier

141 points · 33 comments · nateb2022

  1. nh43215rgb · · focus · HN ↗

      > Built on a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture, Step 5 Preview has 600B total parameters, with 27B active per token, and supports a 1M-token context window and vision input.
    
      > Step 5 Preview scores 44 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
    
      > The model will be released with open weights on October 15.
    
    I guess being Chinese company they decided to skip version 4, while also giving impression to be on the similar iteration with leading companies (claude opus 5). I wonder if other Chinese labs like Kimi/Moonshot will follow suit.
    1. Bolwin · · focus · HN ↗
      Moonshot has already teased K3.1 so not likely
      1. dannyw · · focus · HN ↗
        K3.1 would likely be a deeper/longer post-train from K3, so that’d make sense.

        It’s all marketing anyways, but that’s at least how a lot of labs have been naming things (sometimes).

    2. JohnsonZou · · focus · HN ↗
      Another possible reason is that the number 4 is considered unlucky in traditional Chinese culture.
      1. zozbot234 · · focus · HN ↗
        Parent commenter hinted at that. Yet DeepSeek has released their V4 which was hugely successful, and even their new architecture is marked V4.1. Qwen internals mark their Flash-Next model, also very compelling, as "qwen4exp". So both of them are bucking the negative stereotype.
    3. torginus · · focus · HN ↗
      Dunno, if US labs would embrace this silly logic, then Anthropic would be compelled to release Fable/Opus 6 instead of a .1 release
    4. Tepix · · focus · HN ↗
      600b-a27b doesn’t sound enticing. Also with the higher number of active parameters compared to GLM 5.3 flash and DeepSeek V4/4.1 flash, I don’t see how they want to be more efficient at inference.
    5. NooneAtAll3 · · focus · HN ↗
      I kinda wish everyone just used dates instead...
      1. NetOpWibby · · focus · HN ↗
        Using dates immediately makes you look dated and everyone is in this constant race to be first!!1!!1!

        I agree with you though, ChronVer all the way.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.