‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Apple iPhone 18 Pro Camera test

208 points · 182 comments · luu

  1. matja · · focus · HN ↗
    I'm surprised that in no reviews of the iPhone 18 camera there is mention of the bad quality bokeh, it has heavy ring shapes that looks like what you'd get from a cheap catadioptric lens.

    Edit: e.g. the tree in one of the images in the page: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dxomark.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;PoleHDR_Deep_AppleiPhone18Pro_DxOMark_05-00.jpeg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dxomark.com&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;PoleHDR_D...

    1. mannyv · · focus · HN ↗
      Only professionals and enthusiasts care about bokeh. And I say that as someone that shoots my 50mm 1.2 wide open.

      Previously the blur on iPhone was all software, apparently. I&#x27;ve set mine to do wide open with no bokeh, and i&#x27;ll put it in after.

      But to be honest, the iPhone is the camera I have on me, so the limits are acceptable. Can I force focus it? No. Can I get the glow? No. But iPhone + zoom + crop is better in some ways than my 50mm 1.2 with bokeh.

      1. josephg · · focus · HN ↗
        &gt; But iPhone + zoom + crop is better in some ways than my 50mm 1.2 with bokeh.

        Well, yeah. f1.2 is a nice gimmick but opening up so wide rarely translates into better photos. Don&#x27;t get me wrong - you can get some beautiful portraits with that lens. But in practice, my 24-70 f2.8 zoom lens gets way more use than a 50mm prime.

        There&#x27;s a reason high end phones have multiple cameras on them. It&#x27;s because not every photo wants to be taken at the same focal length.

        I&#x27;d much rather a mirrorless camera with a 24-70 than an iphone. A mirrorless camera with just a 50mm prime will take some beautiful photos. And some photos you won&#x27;t be able to capture at all.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.