> "DXOMARK’s objective measurements and perceptual analyses"
Where are the measurements? All I see are vague generalities like "well-rendered images with improved contrast and natural-looking skin tones". I guess those are the "perceptual analyses"? Is there a "See full measurements" button I'm missing? How do they come up with numbers like "157 Portrait", "172 Outdoors"?
For mobile devices they unfortunately do a much less technical analysis compared to "real" cameras and lenses. Or they just don't publish those parts. It's really unfortunate
gyomu · · focus · HN ↗
Where are the measurements? All I see are vague generalities like "well-rendered images with improved contrast and natural-looking skin tones". I guess those are the "perceptual analyses"? Is there a "See full measurements" button I'm missing? How do they come up with numbers like "157 Portrait", "172 Outdoors"?
opello · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AppleiPhone16ProMax-DxOMark-_-DXOMARK.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AppleiPho...
and then more context, especially for the less objective categories, in this test protocol description:
<a href="https://www.dxomark.com/smartphone-camera-image-quality-test-protocol-a-closer-look/" rel="nofollow">https://www.dxomark.com/smartphone-camera-image-quality-test...
It was a little annoying to find (About Us > How We Test) but not awful I suppose.
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
Melatonic · · focus · HN ↗
j16sdiz · · focus · HN ↗
I am quite sure they have those analysis behind a paywall.