‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

How Hacker News ranking works: scoring, controversy, and penalties (2013)

205 points · 110 comments · theanonymousone

  1. VCFundedGenYer · · focus · HN ↗
    This falls apart completely if you’re like me and only see the list presented on brutalist.report which is strictly chronological and with zero algorithms.
    1. Retr0id · · focus · HN ↗
      Looks algorithmic to me. Reverse-chronological with upvote threshold(?), where upvotes are correlated with sort rank on vanilla HN.
      1. VCFundedGenYer · · focus · HN ↗
        Again, not a thing if you are on the site I mentioned.
        1. tptacek · · focus · HN ↗
          If there's a vote threshold, it's still profoundly influenced by the HN algorithm, because front page exposure is the principal component in how many votes a story gets.
        2. Waterluvian · · focus · HN ↗
          There’s clearly decision-making going on because it’s not listing most HN posts. How is it deciding what not to show?
          1. LastTrain · · focus · HN ↗
            Not to mention HN posts don’t spontaneously emerge out of the randomness of the cosmos.
            1. Waterluvian · · focus · HN ↗
              Sure they do. Just with extra steps.

              Remember that thing Carl Sagan told us: “if you want to complain about AI from scratch you must first invent the universe.”

        3. Retr0id · · focus · HN ↗
          Saying it a second time doesn't make it any more true.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.