‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

English: A vs. An

365 points · 529 comments · azhenley

  1. hbn · · focus · HN ↗
    A funny quirk of English I never noticed until I started learning Spanish:

    In Spanish, to say for example, "he is a doctor," you would say "él es médico." Which more literally translates to "he is doctor," which feels unintuitive coming from English. Spanish DOES have an equivalent for "a" - "un/una", so the natural thing for an English speaker to say would be "él es UN médico", but I understand that to be awkward/unnatural.

    But then I realized, when you say the same sentence in plural - "they are doctors" - you don't have an article. You don't say "they are some doctors" (I had to Google, apparently "some" isn't an article anyway?)

    So Spanish ends up more consistent - Singular: "Él es médico." Plural: "Ellos son medicos."

    Unlike English - Singular: "He is a doctor." Plural: "They are doctors."

    1. nutjob2 · · focus · HN ↗
      In "They are doctors" the 'they' is the subject and you don't need articles. 'They' is plural.

      But in "The doctors are female" you do because the subject is some specific group of doctors. It's singular because its a single group of things.

      1. Joker_vD · · focus · HN ↗
        > you don't need articles. 'They' is plural.

        But why not? Plural indefinite article exists in some languages, why not in English?

        1. inkyoto · · focus · HN ↗
          I can't answer the why question, but out of all Germanic languages, only Faroese has retained the plural indefinite article, although its use is restricted to nouns that 1) only occur in the plural and 2) indicate «a pair/set of», e.g.:

            einar buksur (feminine plural) – a pair of pants
          
            einir skógvar (masculine plural) – a pair of shoes
          
          Other than that, Germanic languages typically do not have a plural form of the indefinite article.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.