Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
lproven · · focus · HN ↗
But the reasons I choose filesystems are more about reliability, failure modes, surrounding tooling, and so on.
Btrfs fails in several critical areas:
1. No way to accurately find free space
2. catastrophic failure on write if a volume fills up, the probability of which is greater because of #1
3. repair tools usually do not recover a corrupted volume and in my testing are most likely to render as damaged volume completely unreadable, which makes #2 worse
Put these things together and I can never trust Btrfs again. In the 9 years since I encountered these, I see no effort to fix them, just fooling around witg unimportant side details like performance tweaks.
Fix the critical issues first then make it faster.
sandreas · · focus · HN ↗
Here is my journey: <a href="https://forum.cgsecurity.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=39143" rel="nofollow">https://forum.cgsecurity.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=39143
I switched to ZFS and never Bad a Problem again.
burnt-resistor · · focus · HN ↗
lproven · · focus · HN ↗
It would mount read-only, then? So you could copy your stuff off onto other media? Because if so, it's better than my experiences with Btrfs.