‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip

179 points · 190 comments · farlight

  1. gdgghhhhh · · focus · HN ↗
    In case someone wonders why bcachefs is sadly no longer part of the mainline kernel. Start reading here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;Articles&#x2F;1027289&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;Articles&#x2F;1027289&#x2F;
    1. lifty · · focus · HN ↗
      Is there any chance bcachefs will be included again in the future?
      1. gdgghhhhh · · focus · HN ↗
        I&#x27;m optimistic.
        1. MBCook · · focus · HN ↗
          I’ve been following kernel development for something like three years using LWN and other sources.

          I can’t remember anyone earning the level of hostile treatment he did and getting kicked out.

          I don’t see how it would ever happen.

          1. locknitpicker · · focus · HN ↗
            &gt; I can’t remember anyone earning the level of hostile treatment he did and getting kicked out.

            You don&#x27;t seem to be following it very closely, as apparently you failed to come across the history of abuse and hostile behavior of bcachefs&#x27;s maintainer.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.