‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Btrfs/ZFS/bcachefs under workloads classic benchmarks skip

179 points · 190 comments · farlight

  1. bhaney · · focus · HN ↗
    Seeing great results from bcachefs just makes me more sad that Kent and the other kernel devs couldn't come to an understanding to keep bcachefs in-tree. I want to use it for my storage arrays so badly, but I'm still stuck with btrfs as the only available in-tree filesystem with modern features.
    1. locknitpicker · · focus · HN ↗
      > Seeing great results from bcachefs just makes me more sad that Kent and the other kernel devs couldn't come to an understanding to keep bcachefs in-tree.

      I think you are sugarcoating the shit show that was bcachefs's history of involvement in the linux kernel. I mean, do I need to mention that the person was subjected to a code of conduct enforcement action due to his long history of abuse and unprofessional behavior?

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;Articles&#x2F;999197&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lwn.net&#x2F;Articles&#x2F;999197&#x2F;

      1. bhaney · · focus · HN ↗
        No, you probably didn&#x27;t need to mention that.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.