‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I think you should almost never use AI to write

363 points · 177 comments · erwald

  1. jameshart · · focus · HN ↗
    Use AI to write things for you to read that you wish someone else had written. ‘Give me a summary of the research on this topic’; ‘Write a report on this data to help me make a decision’. ‘Take this transcript of a meeting and write me the email it could have been’.

    Don’t use AI to write things that you are producing for someone else to consume.

    1. bdangubic · · focus · HN ↗
      I am someone else, if AI can write something that I want to and can consume then it can do the same for other’s consumption. Perhaps a disclaimer would be nice, “co-written with ____” but I see no difference between the two though of course I understand what you are trying to convey conceptually
      1. card_zero · · focus · HN ↗
        That's logical, yes. If person A wants to read a summary (even a generated one) outlining the state of modern space dinosaur research, or whatever, and person B also wants the exact same thing, then person B should be happy to read the summary that person A prompted.

        The same is true if the thing they both want is a stale cupcake bought from a gas station. But this still doesn't mean that person B wants to be presented with person A's stale thing, because the overhead of the social transaction isn't worth the object. Which is to say, it makes a terrible gift.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.