‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

I think you should almost never use AI to write

363 points · 177 comments · erwald

  1. jameshart · · focus · HN ↗
    Use AI to write things for you to read that you wish someone else had written. ‘Give me a summary of the research on this topic’; ‘Write a report on this data to help me make a decision’. ‘Take this transcript of a meeting and write me the email it could have been’.

    Don’t use AI to write things that you are producing for someone else to consume.

    1. bdangubic · · focus · HN ↗
      I am someone else, if AI can write something that I want to and can consume then it can do the same for other’s consumption. Perhaps a disclaimer would be nice, “co-written with ____” but I see no difference between the two though of course I understand what you are trying to convey conceptually
      1. AnimalMuppet · · focus · HN ↗
        There's a difference between me getting AI to write something I want to read, and getting it to write something you want to read. The difference is that I know me, but I don't know you.

        The other difference is that, if I get AI to write something for me, I expect something AI-written. If I am writing something for you, you expect something that I wrote, not something that AI wrote.

        1. cubefox · · focus · HN ↗
          Moreover, when you wrote it yourself, you are intellectually responsible, you can defend it, while if the LLM wrote it for you, nobody is really responsible: The LLM didn't write it "out of its own motivation", it was merely extrapolating your prompt; and you only provided the prompt, not the extrapolation.

          So the intellectual responsibility is diluted to a substantial degree: The text is not the opinion of anyone who can be expected to honestly defend it. It's bullshit in the technical sense.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.