> Zig, by comparison, offered little beyond syntax highlighting and basic autocompletion.
Zig has a language server and "The majority of LSP features are supported" (<a href="https://github.com/zigtools/zls#features" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/zigtools/zls#features).
Zig had a breaking change half year ago and since then ZLS only works for std and local code, not for any deps. Zig is nice language but dev experience is a real nightmare at the moment. I say that as maintainer of three non-trivial libraries, and I have one Zig project in production.
That said, I've been re-evaluating my choices lately.
computerfriend · · focus · HN ↗
Zig has a language server and "The majority of LSP features are supported" (<a href="https://github.com/zigtools/zls#features" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/zigtools/zls#features).
cztomsik · · focus · HN ↗
That said, I've been re-evaluating my choices lately.
brodo · · focus · HN ↗