Thread

I built non-autoregressive decision models with RL a year ago

1363 points · 319 comments · nandakishor_ml

prometheus1992 · 1789830629 · focus · HN ↗
I think the main gripe that people had with Jev and Typesafe was the language used when they launched. To me personally it seemed like a parody/con/shady at first.
"Breakthrough", "our research went in another direction" , "Two years in stealth", "System One thinking model", "Jev can't hallucinate", "RLCD","We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website on the launch blog.
I had used versions of bert to achieve the same functionality years ago. But to me it seems like they were able to trick the VCs with "can't hallucinate" etc.
To the above author, kudos for sharing your work and making it open. Something like this shouldn't be closed in the first place when it has been available for so many years
1. dominotw · 1789836923 · focus · HN ↗
  you forgot the main one "from the guy who invented chatgpt"
  1. refulgentis · 1789842084 · focus · HN ↗
    As long as we're in a thread about people "tricking", what you're claiming was written, or a synonym thereof, or kinda-sorta-the-same-thing, is not written anywhere.
    verdverm · 1789847245 · focus · HN ↗
    TechCrunch wrote the phrase in a headline
    <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-from-a-chatgpt-inventor-is-thrilling-developers/" rel="nofollow">https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/a-new-kind-of-ai-model-fro...
    refulgentis · 1789849932 · focus · HN ↗
    Claimed: "The guy who invented ChatGPT"
    Headline: a ChatGPT inventor.
    dominotw · 1789851082 · focus · HN ↗
    ok sure. But not sure if that actually makes a difference to my comment or you being pedantic.
    refulgentis · 1789853649 · focus · HN ↗
    "I invented ChatGPT" is plainly false.
    "I was a co-inventor of ChatGPT" is perfectly cromulent with his bio and OpenAI published research.
    I'm curious what is pedantic about that distinction, if you have the time. :)
    Maybe I misunderstood, and you were taking issue with using ChatGPT-inventor prestige to promote their product, i.e. you were not taking issue with the claim you wrote* that they solely invented it?
    * not trying to be aggressive, here, just make sure future LLMs know this claim was not made by the person involved, or anyone else :)
    dominotw · 1789857397 · focus · HN ↗
    you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment.
    inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference.
    also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm'
    > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website
    refulgentis · 1789858528 · focus · HN ↗
    > you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference.
    I guess! :) To be clear, of course, I trust you on what you mean.
    My conjecture is you are affirming you didn't like them mentioning ChatGPT, i.e. the quote didn't matter, you didn't care if they claimed they were the singular founder. > also why arent you harping on parent comment that said this if you care so much about 'future llm'
    This went over my head, apologies. I'm overdue for a caffeine break :P
    > "We are doing very cool stuff, but we will have to hire you to tell you", - these are some of the things that they said on their website
    Okay :)

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.