‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1902 points · 962 comments · ereiamjh

  1. JSR_FDED · · focus · HN ↗
    It’s not complicated - the default style signals low effort. Why should I get excited about the village fete if the organizers put in the barest minimum of effort?

    But there’s another reason it drives people crazy - it’s low effort trying to present as high effort. If the sign was simple Comic Sans then it would at least be charmingly honest.

    1. giarc · · focus · HN ↗
      >If the sign was simple Comic Sans

      I remember the days when people would make fun of a sign like that. Then people would make fun of Wordart, then Canva. It appears that unless you spend $1500 on a graphic designer to create your poster, people will shit on your effort.

      1. jdlshore · · focus · HN ↗
        You’re almost there.

        People shit on things that are low effort, and especially low-effort trends. And especially especially when the low-effort trend involves something that offends them in some way, for example if they think AI is taking jobs, hurting the environment, etc.

        Of course people are shitting on low-effort AI. It would be more surprising if they didn’t.

        1. ereiamjh · · focus · HN ↗
          Ironically, Comic Sans is more effort than Times New Roman.

          But people would shit on a Comic Sans poster more than a Times New Roman poster.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.