‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1902 points · 962 comments · ereiamjh

  1. JSR_FDED · · focus · HN ↗
    It’s not complicated - the default style signals low effort. Why should I get excited about the village fete if the organizers put in the barest minimum of effort?

    But there’s another reason it drives people crazy - it’s low effort trying to present as high effort. If the sign was simple Comic Sans then it would at least be charmingly honest.

    1. interleave · · focus · HN ↗
      I agree.

      This week, I created a video for a personal project using AI.

      And, as the creator, I honestly can not say if it's "slop or not."

      So I created a &quot;behind the scenes&quot; page that shows the process I went through before final cut, warts and all. You can find it at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;alexisrondeau.me&#x2F;mosey-site&#x2F;making-of&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;alexisrondeau.me&#x2F;mosey-site&#x2F;making-of&#x2F;

      Do you think this helps you decide if it&#x27;s slop or not?

      1. allenu · · focus · HN ↗
        You might be a little too close to the work to judge, but to me it still looks off. I suppose I might not immediately think it was AI, but there&#x27;s something not quite human about it. The video contents are a little too sterile and clean, lacking character. The room is quite empty and the composition doesn&#x27;t cause me to focus on any one thing. That said, you could probably improve a bit of it with some prompting.

        The making-of post itself also is clearly LLM generated, probably by Claude, judging by the language used.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.