‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1902 points · 962 comments · ereiamjh

  1. throwaway13337 · · focus · HN ↗
    I think we're in the 'early digital camera' phase of AI art gen.

    The real photographers knew they were shit photos. They were grainy, bad lenses, and ugly. A lot of people still liked them because they were much more convenient for a lot of uses than the film ones.

    Well, I guess there's still a lot of film people. But film had a ceiling. Digital cameras kept getting better.

    The adaptive film photographers eventually adopted the tool. A lot of their skills transferred well to the new medium. Most waited until the cameras got good enough, though.

    I'm not sure when that'll be with AI art gen. Seeing scenes broken up into layers in the latest gpt image generation, though, made me think we might be near.

    1. Sharlin · · focus · HN ↗
      Incidentally, the "early digital camera" aesthetic has been back in style for a couple of years now.
      1. rubidium · · focus · HN ↗
        It’s the same cultural response as the analog movement. The collective sense that everything Covid on stole our future, and AI is only making it worse.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.